Kansas is manner behind in terms of hashish laws, as their legal guidelines are a number of the strictest within the nation, and so they’ve but to see something vital come via. Nonetheless, they are finally moving in a positive direction in terms of staff comp.
A brand new invoice would assist be sure that an worker can nonetheless get cash for being injured on the job, even when they’re a cannabis person, and the invoice would settle for that hashish will not be in the identical class as different managed substances.
This new proposed invoice, often known as House Bill 2040, would take hashish off of the drug impairment record, which means that even when a employee is discovered to have sure ranges of hashish of their system following an harm, they aren’t mechanically saved from getting staff’ comp cash due to their hashish use. This could change issues for many who use hashish of their spare time exterior of labor, as hashish can keep within the system for weeks after use.
In authorized language, the invoice would create a “rebuttable presumption” that an injured employee who has used alcohol or unlawful medicine, additionally together with cocaine, opiates, and methamphetamines, can nonetheless attempt for a payout. It could take away hashish and THC from the record of medication that trigger impairment totally. So, whereas that is nonetheless a really small step in comparison with what many states are doing, they’re making it a degree to distinguish between hashish and different managed substances.
Along with H.B. 2040, Kansas lawmakers additionally launched Home Invoice 2016, which might additionally have an effect on staff’ comp claims. The invoice would look into whether or not or not the accident was a “substantial” consider inflicting the business, somewhat than simply the “prevailing” issue.
These payments would go into impact instantly if they’re signed into regulation.
Hashish in Kansas
This could be a minor victory for hashish in Kansas, however it will nonetheless be substantial, because the state has had hardly any victories in that area. Final yr, the state even objected to pushing via a regulation that might reduce hashish possession penalties, a child step that may be a far cry from full, leisure legalization.
As a result of the committee that reviewed the regulation is Republican-controlled, even this measure didn’t make it via to turn into a regulation. Many felt it was too excessive of a transfer for the state on the time.
“I nonetheless don’t imagine that marijuana must be legalized,” said GOP Rep. Stephen Owens on the time, relating to his opposition. “I imagine this was a step in that path.”
Nonetheless, others believed that this minor step may very well be a strong lead into full-scale legalization for hashish,
“I assumed this was gentle sufficient that it would get via the committee,” mentioned Democratic Rep. Boog Highberger, who hoped to see the brand new laws cross. “I can’t clarify it.”
It’s nonetheless not clear if H.B 2040 and H.B. 2016 will cross, however as that is a fair milder measure in the direction of cannabis legalization, advocates are nonetheless hopeful.