Home Marijuana California Hashish Claims: Defamation – Canna Legislation Weblog™

California Hashish Claims: Defamation – Canna Legislation Weblog™


Final 12 months, we had a mini-series on the weblog that coated the 5 commonest causes of motion we had been seeing within the hashish trade (hyperlinks to the collection are on the backside of this put up). In comply with up, we’ve been getting fairly quite a lot of session requests or questions from present purchasers about one other infamous declare that appears to be rampant recently: defamation. This week, we’ll cowl the fundamentals on defamation as a result of it’s really not the straightforward and simple declare you would possibly assume it’s.


At its core, defamation includes a false, unprivileged assertion about a person. Defamation is damaged down into two classes – libel and slander:

  • Civil Code s. 45 defines libel as “a false and unprivileged publication by writing, printing, image, effigy or different mounted illustration to the attention, which exposes any particular person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or averted, or which tends to injure him in his occupation.” Briefly, libel is written.
  • Civil Code s. 46 defines slander as “a false and unprivileged publication, orally uttered, and in addition communications by radio or any mechanical or different means …” Slander is oral.

Libel and slander are additional damaged down as “per se” or “per quod.” Libel per se means the written assertion is defamatory on its face. Slander per se means the oral assertion implicates the plaintiff with one of many following:

  • Legal exercise
  • Contagious, infectious or loathsome illness
  • Unethical/incompetent enterprise conduct (most related)
  • Impotence or unchastity

Libel or slander per se are mainly extra egregious and implicate presumed damages. Libel or slander per quod is something that doesn’t qualify as libel or slander per se.

Statute of Limitations

A defamation reason behind motion must be introduced inside one 12 months. The clock begins ticking when the assertion is printed – not when the plaintiff discovers it (for essentially the most half). Publishing on a web site counts!

Components of a Defamation Declare

  1. Assertion: this may be in any type of communication, and the assertion have to be of reality, not opinion. Nevertheless, watch out about this – simply since you begin your “opinion” with qualifying phrases like “apparently,” or “you would possibly say,” doesn’t imply your assertion is undoubtedly an opinion. The court docket will determine whether or not a press release is an actionable reality or an unactionable opinion.
  2. Concerning the plaintiff: the assertion must be in regards to the plaintiff. Notice: entities rely as plaintiffs!
  3. Publication: publication doesn’t imply the assertion must be in {a magazine} or mentioned on a well-liked podcast – whether it is communicated to no less than one particular person (apart from the plaintiff), that counts as publication.
  4. Defamatory that means: the court docket determines as a matter of legislation whether or not a communication is defamatory – however generally, if it lowers plaintiff’s esteem locally, it’s defamatory.
  5. Fault: defendant failed to make use of affordable care to find out the reality or falsity of the allegedly defamatory assertion.
  6. Causation:
    • Libel or slander per se: Statements which are defamatory per se are so critical that causation is presumed. The plaintiff doesn’t must show precise harm.
    • Libel per quod: the plaintiff should show he/she/it suffered “particular damages” as a proximate results of the defamation. Particular damages are outlined as “all damages that plaintiff alleges and proves that she or he has suffered in respect to his or her property, enterprise, commerce, career, or occupation, together with the quantities of cash the plaintiff alleges and proves she or he has expended because of the alleged libel …”
    • Slander per quod: the plaintiff should show he/she/it suffered precise harm.
  7. Damages


The treatments obtainable are a bit nebulous, and so they additionally rely upon which sub-claim is being asserted:

  • Compensatory Damages: examples embody hurt to the plaintiff’s repute, hurt to the plaintiff’s property, enterprise, commerce, career, bills the plaintiff needed to pay because of the defamation, and even emotional misery.
  • Injunctive Reduction: an order enjoining future publication of the defamatory statements.
  • Punitive Damages: the place the defendant is discovered of responsible of oppression, fraud or malice, punitive damages could also be awarded as effectively.

In my subsequent put up, we’ll cowl a California-specific physique of legislation referred to as the anti-SLAPP legal guidelines that goal to curb the quantity of baseless defamation claims on the market – and make the calculus of pursuing and defending them much more difficult.

Listed here are these hyperlinks to our previous mini-series: